|
Criteria |
5 points |
3 points |
1 point |
0 points |
Score |
|
Use of Resources |
Cites Resources
and outside
links in analysis. Uses additional online
references. |
Cites Resources
links in analysis. |
Some references
used. |
No references
used. |
|
|
Selection and
ranking of
camera criteria |
Used 5 or more
selection criteria from Resources,
prioritized and ranked
candidates with rationale. |
Less than 5 criteria used or none are
prioritized/weighted and all are ranked with
rationale. |
Less than 5
criteria used and/or none
ranked and prioritized. |
No criteria
used and/or none are supported by Resources. |
|
|
Design of
spreadsheet |
Visually
appealing. Logically structured. Formulas
correct. |
Some formatting
used for fonts, cells or tables. Formulas used
and correct. |
Some formatting
used for fonts, cells or tables. Formulas used
and correct. |
No formatting
used for fonts, cells or tables. Scattered data. |
|
|
Recommendation
document |
Persuasive. No
grammar or spelling errors.
Includes numerous
reasons with appropriate explanation/analysis to
support recommendation. Neat, professional
appearance. |
Convincing but
some grammar and spelling errors. Some reasons
for conclusion given. Neat, professional
appearance. |
Some focus.
Unconvincing. Some grammar and spelling errors. |
Scattered,
unfocused. Excessive spelling or grammar errors
and/or did not use Recommendation Report
resource. |
|
|
Task elements |
Completed all
task elements. |
Completed most
task elements. |
Completed some
task elements. |
Did not complete
any task elements. |
|
|
|
|
|
Points |
|
|
|
|
|
2 x Points= |
|
|
Bonus points |
|
|
Total Score |
|
